Thomas Gainsborough
by Elaine D. Gustafson
In
addition to being one of England's finest talents, the eighteenth-century
painter Thomas Gainsborough was a superb portraitist who left an indelible
mark on the genre. The basic facts of Gainsborough's beginnings are
as follows: The artist was born in 1727 in the quiet Suffolk town of
Sudbury, about fifty miles northeast of London. The fifth son of nine
children, he was sent at age thirteen to London to become the assistant
and pupil of the French engraver Hubert Gravelot; later he studied painting
with Francis Hayman, who specialized in historical scenes.
In 1746, when he was nineteen years old, he married
Margaret Burr, who received an annuity of 200 pounds all her life. This
money allowed Gainsborough to continue to paint without ever having
to worry about the sale of his works generating enough income to support
his wife and two daughters, Mary and Margaret.
Around 1748, Gainsborough left London and returned
to Sudbury, but later moved to Ipswich for seven or eight years. His
success as a portrait artist, however, came in 1759 when he moved to
the provincial town of Bath, an English resort town which was then attracting
the country's rich and famous in large numbers. He remained there until
1774, when the growing demand for his portraits led him to resettle
in London.
During
the first half of the eighteenth century England experienced a period
of burgeoning prosperity. An increasingly affluent and culturally aware
middle class arose and began to patronize the arts and literature, especially
in London, then the center of fashion and luxury production. This patronage
led to a growth in the capital's artistic community as well as to the
development of what is now called the British school of painting.
As in Holland in the seventeenth century, the increased
wealth of the English middle classes resulted in a heightened desire
for painted portraits, the only branch of painting in which an artist
of the period could achieve prosperity.
This taste for portraiture was met essentially by two
native sons: Thomas Gainsborough and his rival, Sir Joshua Reynolds
(1723-1792), both of whom came to be recognized as the leading portrait
painters of their day. Gainsborough and Reynolds were rivals in the
sense that they were in direct competition with one another for the
limited market for expensive, fashionable portraits. However, contrary
to popular belief, each artist respected the other's talents. In fact,
Reynolds owned a work by Gainsborough.
Thomas Gainsborough was extremely astute to move his
family to Bath in 1759. The town was one of England's most fashionable
winter resorts, and it was there that he gained the attention of wealthy
Londoners as well as developed an elegant and relaxed portrait style
that was suitable for this clientele.
Gainsborough's commercial success can be assessed by
the over 1,000 portraits he painted.
His early style was formed by a study of the figures of Jean-Antoine
Watteau and other seventeenth-century French Rococo painters. However,
his approach was much more serious than the frivolous lightheartedness
of their images. Also notable in Gainsborough's portraits is the influence
of the seventeenth-century Flemish artist Sir Anthony van Dyck, specifically
in regard to posture and gesture as well as the handling of light, color
and textures. In fact, it has been said that Gainsborough combined the
grace of Watteau's figures with the cool elegance and attenuation of
van Dyck's lords and ladies.
Although Gainsborough derived inspiration from earlier
Continental painters, he achieved in his half- and full-length portraits
a freshness and lyric grace all his own. Despite many of the Grand Manner
elements contained within his work, Gainsborough's portraits suggest
the vigor and immediacy of sketches.
The artist is celebrated for the beauty of his color,
the delicacy of his touch, and the elegance and refinement of his sitters.
Like all eighteenth-century portraitists, Gainsborough took great care
to paint his sitters' faces accurately. However the rest of the paintings'
surfaces shimmer with flashing brush strokes. This feathery brush work
was achieved by using light, rapid strokes in a subtle palette. In fact,
as a colorist, Gainsborough has had few rivals among English painters.
He generally preferred cool, fresh colors, chiefly greens and blues,
thinly applied. Typically Gainsborough's loose brush strokes masterfully
catch the soft shimmer of light playing over the various fabrics of
his sitter's clothing, a spectacular feature of his work.
Gainsborough
also was careful to control the light and dark values of his portraits,
keeping in mind the conditions that they would meet in their permanent
homes. Remember that the walls of eighteenth-century British mansions
were seldom brightly lighted, with natural light being blocked by heavy
window treatments, and candles were the normal illumination after sundown.
Gainsborough's tendency to slightly elongate his figures made his subjects
appear regal and elegant despite their informal poses. Interestingly,
Gainsborough never worked without the sitter in front of him. However,
their clothing and jewelry usually were studio props.
Among his favorite subjects were his two daughters,
Margaret and Mary. Gainsborough painted at least five double and several
individual portraits of them at various ages. Each of these works convey
the close relationship the two girls shared. Except for his nephew and
apprentice, Gainsborough Dupont, Gainsborough employed no assistants
to help paint drapery or the backgrounds of his portraits, an unusual
practice for his day. However, even without such help, his speed was
phenomenal.
Although Gainsborough was a favorite among England's
aristocratic class, he had little taste for the high society he painted,
preferring to paint landscapes in his spare time. These idealized landscapes
were created in the studio on the basis of small models put together
from moss, pebbles and other materials. Fashioned after the work of
such seventeenth-century Dutch masters of landscape as Jacob van Ruisdael
and Jan Wynants, these works were among the first great landscapes painted
in England. However, as there was no market for this genre, Gainsborough
settled for occasionally posing his figures in front of a landscape
background. Thus some patrons got a bonus, almost two paintings in one!
Gainsborough received many accolades for his genteel,
fashionable portraits. In 1768 he was invited to become one of thirty-six
founding members of the Royal Academy of Arts, a position that carried
valuable prestige. This group of artists was not only made up of England's
leading painters, but was headed by Gainsborough's rival, Sir Joshua
Reynolds and sponsored by King George III. Gainsborough, however, later
withdrew from the Academy, preferring to exhibit his paintings in his
own home, Schomberg House, Pall Mall.
Word of Gainsborough's reputation eventually spread
from Bath to London, and in 1774 the artist moved his large, lucrative
portrait practice there. In a few years, he was sparring with Sir Joshua
Reynolds for the enormous profit and prestige of being the leading portrait
painter in Britain and even in Europe.
After he settled in London Gainsborough became more
experimental than at any other time of his career, painting much more
freely and broadly. In his last years, he excelled in fancy pictures,
a pastoral genre that featured idealized subjects.
Gainsborough's artistic and commercial success continued
until his death in 1788. With his portraits, he not only immortalized
an extraordinary group of people, but succeeded in providing a unique
window to eighteenth-century England. His canvases document the physical
look of Britain's aristocrats, soldiers, squires, statesmen, and assorted
folk of leisure and means, as well as the very spirit, style and culture
of these leading citizens. Most importantly, however, Gainsborough had
a lasting and significant influence on British painting and portraiture
in general.
_____________________________________________________________________
Elaine D. Gustafson is the Curator of Contemporary
Art at the Tampa Museum of Art. She has held posts at museums in Montgomery,
Toledo, Detroit and Worcester. She holds a Bachelor's degree from Wheaton
College and a Master's from Brown University.
|